I had to read this several times. I still find it difficult to digest- not the principles but Seth as the teacher or library. I have gotten a lot out of reading Jane Roberts’ books imparting Seth wisdom yet the first time I read Seth at the urging of a person who turned out to be harmful to me, I read where another deeper Seth came through in a session and said- you don’t need Seth to understand spirit even as your understanding is less far away from Seth than I am from Seth. Something like that- layers in the realm of understanding our spiritual development. I thought that sounded right and quit reading where admittedly the whole idea of channeling was super weird to me and I don’t feel like there is distance between me and god- truth, love, eternal life in Spirit, including the self proclaimed intermediary Seth.
This was also so as the person urging my reading told me of many of Seth’s lives and he seemed to be somewhat of a substandard human being, frankly, in his professed human lives.
I don’t understand all the sources of spiritual wisdom and only know if something sounds true or not true. I found truth here in your session but it was complicated. The simplistic truth I found was: “Science is the master of physicality and a denier of the eternal nature of consciousness.” Of course real science is not just a search with parameters; it is the finding of true knowledge - something our collective science denies for lack of understanding spirit as supreme.
Thank you for your vital work. As I say all the time struggling with speaking a foreign language: apendiendo- I am learning.